A Review Of case laws on bail
A Review Of case laws on bail
Blog Article
Therefore, In case the intent to cause injury is proven and it can be further proven that during the ordinary course of nature, that injury would cause death, that matter is now objective and also the intention to destroy (the main factor that must
ninety three . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming towards the main case, It is usually a nicely-established proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is subject to your procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings over the evidence.
four. It has been noticed by this Court that there is actually a delay of at some point in the registration of FIR which has not been explained by the complainant. Moreover, there isn't any eye-witness of your alleged event along with the prosecution is depending on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession of the petitioners is tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of these namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram transpired to become the real brothers in the deceased but they didn't respond at all towards the confessional statements from the petitioners and calmly saw them leaving, a single after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not glimpse much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on fourteen.02.2018 and there is no explanation as to why her arrest was not effected after making with the alleged extra judicial confession. It has been held on a lot of situations that extra judicial confession of the accused is really a weak sort of evidence which can be manoeuvred by the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not occur their way. The prosecution can also be counting on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal didn't say a word regarding existence of some light at the place, where they allegedly saw the petitioners with each other on the motorcycle at 4.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
criminal revision application is dismissed. reduced to your period of his detention in jail he has already undergone(Criminal Revision )
It allows individuals to research legal issues, understand their rights, and prepare for legal proceedings. This access is particularly important in Pakistan, where legal support is often costly and tricky to get hold of.
only about the ground of miscases remanded & only on the ground of misreading of evidence only to the ground of misreading of evidence . disposed of(Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979)
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle set up by a court, which other courts are obligated to comply with.
after release from the prison he shed interest to contest the instant appeal , appeal is dismissed (Criminal Jail Appeal )
In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist click here Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution is often justified when The fundamental norm underlying a Constitution disappears and a new system is set in its place.
Online access to the statewide search of adult criminal case information during the juvenile & domestic relations district courts, criminal and traffic case information in general district courts and select circuit courts. Note: Payments cannot be made using this system.
Generally speaking, higher courts tend not to have direct oversight over the decreased courts of record, in that they cannot reach out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments in the decrease courts.
Because of this, simply just citing the case is more likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Imagine it as calling someone to tell them you’ve found their missing phone, then telling them you live in such-and-this sort of community, without actually providing them an address. Driving round the community seeking to find their phone is probably going to become more frustrating than it’s really worth.
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a twelve-year outdated boy from his home to protect him from the horrible physical and sexual abuse he experienced endured in his home, and to prevent him from abusing other children during the home. The boy was placed within an emergency foster home, and was later shifted around within the foster care system.